- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme
ArticlesJUDICIAL SEPARATION VS. DIVORCE

JUDICIAL SEPARATION VS. DIVORCE

Introduction

Law enforcement is tasked with maintaining peace within a community. The majority of religions usually prohibit the notion of divorce or separation since marriage is generally seen as holy. The majority of religions in India neither discourage nor encourage divorce because marriage is the cornerstone of Indian culture and values. For Indians, marriage usually forms the cornerstone of their lives. Understanding the distinction between a divorce and a judicial separation is therefore essential. While a divorce is the termination of a valid marriage, a judicial separation is a temporary division that allows couples to ‘live apart’ while their marriage remains legally intact. Additionally, this provides grounds to rectify issues such as domestic violence or any other matrimonial disputes. Despite being legally separated, a couple’s rights, obligations, and liabilities continue to remain intact. The only difference is that the partners choose to live separately.

Due to pressure from society to maintain the appearance of a happy marriage, the legal process may take some time, and the couple may be somewhat hesitant. The border between judicial separation and divorce is, however, quite narrow.

The Difference Between Divorce And Judicial Separation

  • A judicial separation is the temporary suspension of conjugal rights to be in a marriage or their financial responsibilities. While divorce is the legal procedure by which a marriage is dissolved.
  • While divorce has the primary goal of freeing the couple from their marital duties, judicial separation’s mission is to investigate the possibility of their reunion.
  • Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 contains the laws relating to judicial separation, whereas Section 13 covers the provisions relating to divorce.
  • The granting of a decree for separation is the sole stage in the judicial separation procedure, making it significantly quicker and less time-consuming. 
  • The judicial separation application may be submitted immediately following the marriage, but the divorce application must wait at least one year (although it may be granted sooner in exceptional circumstances).
  • In a judicial separation, the husband and wife’s legal standing is unaffected; but, since the divorce breaks the marriage, it also ends their legal connection.
  • After a divorce, couples are free to remarry without restriction – a right that is not available when a court grants a judicial separation. When a marriage ends through judicial separation, the right to inherit stays in place; however, when a divorce order is declared, it not only brings certain obligations to an end, but all rights concerning inheritance are also satisfied.

Judicial Separation

According to Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, any spouse to a marriage, whether it was performed before or after the law’s implementation, may submit a petition for judicial separation. The parties are not required to live together even if a judgment is made in their favour. However, some matrimonial rights and duties remain. During the separation, they are not permitted to be remarried. Throughout the separation, rights and responsibilities were still suspended. The same reasons apply for a divorce as they do for a judicial separation.

Despite the decree that has been issued, either party may appeal to the court to demonstrate the legitimacy of their initial judgment of judicial separation. Such a decision, however, must be made reasonably and can only be justified with the issuing of sound evidence.

Marriage can be complex and far-reaching, with various reasons that might lead to one seeking a decree of judicial separation. The various grounds for such a petition are set out in section 13(1) – for either party – and 13(2) – primarily for the wife. These conditions are similar to those for filing a divorce petition.

Effects Of Judicial Separation

It can be seen as a step closer to divorce. Even so, reconciliation is always a possibility.  The parties’ marital status is not terminated by judicial separation. The complex concept of judicial separation should not be taken lightly. Despite this ruling, the couple remains legally married. Committing the act of bigamy, by either party, is considered a crime and has serious implications. The surviving party is the legitimate successor to the deceased’s property if either of the parties passes away while the decree of judicial separation is in force.

Judicial Separation Under Various Laws

Judicial separation under the Special Marriage Act, 1954

A husband or wife may consider applying for a judgment of judicial separation by Section 23 of the Special Marriage Act of 1954, where necessary.  A judicial separation order grants spouses legal relief from any existing disagreements, dispels the contractual duties tied to the marriage contract, and ultimately extinguishes the union. When a decree for the restoration of conjugal rights is disobeyed by the parties to the marriage.

Judicial separation under the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969

The Special Marriage Act of 1954 supplies the stringent mandate that in the event one partner goes against an order to revive matrimonial links, it denotes a justifiable ground. The complexity of text and variations between sentences is paramount with this ruling, by Section 23(1)(b). This clause enables the Central Government to make a notification that foreign laws regarding marriage have the same effect in India as the laws concerning marriage here.

Judicial separation under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936

A married person may seek judicial separation on any grounds for which a divorce action may be brought, according to Section 34 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. The provisions of Section 35 specify the circumstances under which the court may decline to issue a judgement of judicial separation or divorce.

Maintenance During Judicial Separation

Even though they are living apart, a woman who is unable to support herself may ask the husband for maintenance through a legal separation decision. In Sanju Devi v. State of Bihar (2017), the husband asserted that the wife was not entitled to maintenance since a legal separation judgment was in effect at the time. Furthermore, a woman who is judicially separated is also entitled to support, and the judicial separation judgment does not take away her ability to do so.

Divorce

The parties lose their status as husband and wife in divorce cases. The marriage is ended through divorce, and all shared rights and duties are also cancelled. The provisions for divorce are covered in Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Seeking to end a marriage amidst the new laws introduced under the Act, either the husband or the wife can take the initiative and file a divorce petition – which may result in a decree of divorce being issued. Such proceedings may be taken, regardless of whether the marital bonds were formed before or after the Act. Such documents serve as the grounds for dissolution, illuminating the reasons behind the decision.  Exploring Section 13(1) of the Act, the recognized reasons for dissolving a marital union include having different effects for either spouse.

In the matter of Vinay Khurana v. Shweta Khurana (2022), the Delhi High Court clarified the extent of judicial separation and divorce. According to the Hindu Marriage Act, there is a qualitative difference between judicial separation and divorce, according to the Delhi High Court. A judicial separation decree does not end a marital connection; rather, a divorce decree ends the legal relationship between the husband and wife and releases them from their legal marital duties. A judicial separation decree can be revoked by the same court that gave the decree, while a divorce decision can only be reversed by a judicial order, either in an appeal or a review.

Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage

The inclusion of irretrievable breakdown as a cause for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, of 1955, has been the subject of several discussions. The Indian government forwarded the case to the Eighth Law Commission. It is important to remember that an irretrievable collapse of a marriage is not a reason to get a judicial separation declaration.  It is implied by the phrase “irretrievably broken down” that the marriage has deteriorated and cannot be rescued or rebuilt.

Is Judicial Separation The Same As Divorce?

Divorce and judicial separation are not the same thing. Despite being unable to be remarried, the pair is nonetheless regarded as legally married. A divorce can be requested when a couple no longer wishes to remain in a legally bound union, and thus, part ways. While this decision often serves as the most feasible option, the couple must come to terms with the fallout of the process, both emotionally and financially. The distribution of property, assets, and obligations, as well as choices regarding child custody, visitation, support, and other issues, can make divorce processes more difficult.

While divorce permanently ends a marriage, judicial separation offers a break from marital responsibilities and duties. Despite this necessary procedure, the decision to grant separation or divorce rests solely in the court’s hands based on the evidence they have presented. In conclusion, judicial separation and Divorce both include a legal procedure to acknowledge a married couple’s separation, but they have different legal consequences and outcomes.

The processes for divorce and judicial separation are extremely different, even though the grounds for both are the same. The marriage ends if the husband and wife are given a divorce judgment, and they are then free to start new domestic relationships with other people. The two parties cannot get into new relationships if they are granted a judicial separation judgment since they are still recognized as married.

In the case of Vinay Khurana v. Shweta Khurana, the Delhi High Court remarked that judicial separation and divorce are distinct, even though they are both granted on comparable grounds. While legal separation does not destroy the marital link between husband and wife, divorce frees them from it, allowing them to remarry. As a result, the court ruled that the previous Family Court ruling, which awarded a decree of judicial separation instead of a divorce, was invalid. 

Divorce After Judicial Separation

A couple who has obtained a judicial separation may seek a divorce based on the reasons after a year of living apart. The process of filing for divorce after a judicial separation can be as simple or complex as the individual situation demands. In some cases, couples have decided to obtain a judicial separation before initiating the divorce, making the outcomes of the process, including the division of assets, debts, and property, highly dependent on the prior decision. For instance, when assigning property and assets, as well as any alimony or child support that was paid during that period, the court may take the length of the separation into account.

Divorce And Judicial Separation Have Different Characteristics

  • Legal status: However, a judicial separation maintains the pair legally married and forbids their subsequent remarriage. When a couple files for divorce, their marriage is officially over and they are unable to reconcile or begin a new life together.
  • Future Rights and Responsibilities: In the event of a divorce, each party is freed from any future legal obligations and rights to the other, such as inheritance rights. In contrast, in a judicial separation, the parties’ rights and obligations stay the same.
  • Court proceedings: Divorce is broader and more complex than legal separation, according to court procedures. In both circumstances, the court may make decisions about matters such as child custody, visitation rights, and financial support; but the divorce process may take longer to complete since the court must split property and assets.
  • Grounds: While the grounds for divorce and judicial separation share certain characteristics, divorce can also be granted when a marriage has irretrievably broken down. In contrast, in the instance of judicial separation, this issue is not relevant.

Conclusion

A judicial separation is a legally enforceable split that could be patched up in the end. The temporary relief from a couple’s marital duties is known as judicial separation. The court asks the unhappy parties to reevaluate their relationship and give it another opportunity before separating. A divorce may be initiated for judicial separation, but judicial separation cannot be the cause of the divorce. Additionally, it is not necessary for the people who are complaining to live apart. Not from the household, but from commitments, judicial separation is a release.

References

  • vardags.com/law-guide/alternatives-divorce/judicial-separation
  • vidhikarya.com/legal-blog/judicial-separation-and-divorce-under-Hindu-law
  • Lawyered.in/legal-disrupt/articles/judicial-separation-and-divorce-under-hindu-law/
  • Inlightoflaw.com/2021/12/difference-between-judicial-separation-and-divorce.html
  • blog.ipleaders.in/judicial-separation-and-divorce/
  • Probono-india.in/blog-detail
  • Ezylegal.in/blogs/difference-between-judicial-separation-and-divorce

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Subscribe Today

GET EXCLUSIVE FULL ACCESS TO PREMIUM CONTENT

SUPPORT NONPROFIT JOURNALISM

EXPERT ANALYSIS OF AND EMERGING TRENDS IN CHILD WELFARE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE

TOPICAL VIDEO WEBINARS

Get unlimited access to our EXCLUSIVE Content and our archive of subscriber stories.

Exclusive content

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme

Latest article

More article

- Advertisement -Newspaper WordPress Theme